zevOS

01Case study · Fleets & logistics

Fitting a full depot behind an existing sanctioned load

Adding buses meant either upgrading the connection — eighteen months and substantial capex — or making the existing one go further.

Electric bus fleet depotMunicipal depot, South IndiaComposite scenario
  • 28

    Buses charging overnight

  • 1

    Sanctioned connection, unchanged

  • 4 hrs

    Departure window every morning

The deployment

Profile

Vehicles
Electric buses on fixed route schedules
Charging window
Overnight, with a fixed morning departure sequence
Constraint
Sanctioned load below simultaneous full-power demand

The problem

What was in the way

  1. 01The fleet grew faster than the electrical connection, and a sanction upgrade meant a long lead time and significant capital.
  2. 02Uncontrolled charging tripped the site during the first hour after the fleet returned, when every bus plugged in at once.
  3. 03Drivers should not be making payments at a depot, but energy still had to be attributed per vehicle for cost-per-kilometre reporting.
  4. 04Off-peak electricity was materially cheaper and nothing was exploiting it.

The approach

What was actually done

Each step names the mechanism rather than the outcome, so you can judge whether it would transfer to your situation.

01

Per-EVSE ceilings enforced on the charger

Each charge point received a default charging profile in amps, sent as a TxDefaultProfile and re-applied automatically after every boot — so a unit power-cycled by depot staff came back with the limit intact rather than at factory maximum.

02

Shared capacity rather than first-come-first-served

Available site capacity is distributed across active sessions and returned to the pool as buses complete, so the vehicles still charging speed up rather than the last arrivals being starved.

03

Tap to charge, no payment leg

RFID authorisation with vehicle and driver groups replaced any payment flow, with a local authorisation list on the chargers so a connectivity blip could not strand the depot.

04

Cost attribution per vehicle

Every session carries its tag, vehicle and energy, so consumption rolls up per bus and per route and exports into the fleet’s own cost reporting.

The outcome

What changed

  • The full fleet charges overnight inside the existing sanction, with the connection upgrade deferred.
  • The post-return demand spike is shaped rather than tripped.
  • Energy cost is attributable per vehicle, which made cost per kilometre a reportable number rather than an estimate.
  • Charging shifted into the cheaper overnight window without anyone managing it manually.

Would the same approach work for you?

Tell us your constraints and we will say honestly which parts of this transfer and which do not.