zevOS

01Case study · eMSP

Building an eMSP on roaming connections rather than capital

A fleet-card business already had the drivers. What it did not have was a charging network — and no intention of building one.

Fleet card and mobility operatorMulti-state, West and South IndiaComposite scenario
  • 0

    Chargers owned

  • 6

    Roaming partners connected

  • 1

    Invoice per fleet, per month

The deployment

Profile

Existing base
Corporate fuel-card customers with mixed fleets
Assets
None — the product is the driver relationship
Protocol
OCPI 2.2.1 in the eMSP role
Billing
Post-paid monthly against a corporate account

The problem

What was in the way

  1. 01Drivers were carrying four charging apps and four wallets, and expensing each separately.
  2. 02Every network billed differently, and nothing could be checked against what the drivers had actually consumed.
  3. 03Building a charging network was never the plan — the business is the account relationship.
  4. 04Corporate customers wanted one invoice with per-vehicle attribution, not a folder of receipts.

The approach

What was actually done

Each step names the mechanism rather than the outcome, so you can judge whether it would transfer to your situation.

01

Connect rather than build

OCPI credentials handshakes with six partner networks brought their locations, live status and tariffs into one app. Each connection took about a day technically; the commercial agreements took considerably longer, which is the usual ratio.

02

One token, every network

Driver tokens are published to partners so a single identity authorises at any connected charger. The driver sees one app and one balance regardless of whose hardware they are standing at.

03

CDRs reconciled, not trusted

Inbound charge detail records are stored and matched against each partner statement, so a disputed line can be traced to the session that produced it rather than argued in the abstract.

04

Corporate billing on top

Sessions roll up per driver, per vehicle and per department into a single monthly invoice with GST, which is the artefact the customer actually buys.

The outcome

What changed

  • A charging product live without a single charger on the balance sheet.
  • Partner invoices verifiable line by line against stored CDRs.
  • One monthly invoice per corporate account, with per-vehicle attribution.
  • New partner networks added as a credentials exchange rather than a project.

Would the same approach work for you?

Tell us your constraints and we will say honestly which parts of this transfer and which do not.