zevOS

01Case study · Fleets & logistics

Low-power charging at the volume India actually runs on

The segment that dominates Indian electrification is three-wheelers — and almost nothing in charging software is built for it.

Last-mile logistics operatorFour hubs, National Capital RegionComposite scenario
  • 140

    Three-wheelers

  • 4

    Hubs

  • 2

    Shift changeovers a day

The deployment

Profile

Vehicles
Electric three-wheelers on fixed delivery routes
Hardware
Low-power AC points, Bharat AC-001 and LEV sockets
Pattern
Opportunity charging between shifts, not overnight
Drivers
Rotating, high turnover

The problem

What was in the way

  1. 01Charging happens in two short windows a day, not overnight, so every point has to be turning over.
  2. 02Drivers rotate frequently, and issuing a new payment method per driver was never going to work.
  3. 03Cost per delivery needed energy attributed per vehicle, not per hub.
  4. 04Low-power AC hardware is the cheap part; the software written for car charging assumes it away.

The approach

What was actually done

Each step names the mechanism rather than the outcome, so you can judge whether it would transfer to your situation.

01

Tap to charge, tied to the vehicle

RFID tags are issued against vehicles rather than drivers, so a rotating driver picks up whichever vehicle is assigned without any account change. Authorisation is answered centrally with a local list on each point.

02

Limits that fit a shift

Per-session energy caps stop a single vehicle occupying a point beyond what its route needs, which is what keeps the changeover window workable.

03

Attribution per vehicle and per route

Every session carries its tag, vehicle and energy, so consumption rolls up to cost per kilometre and per delivery rather than a hub-level electricity bill.

04

Hub-level scoping

Each hub supervisor sees their own points only, with operate rights to reset a unit and clear a bay.

The outcome

What changed

  • Both changeover windows absorbed without adding charge points.
  • Driver turnover decoupled from charging access entirely.
  • Energy cost attributable per vehicle and per route.
  • Hardware chosen for the vehicle mix rather than for cars.

Would the same approach work for you?

Tell us your constraints and we will say honestly which parts of this transfer and which do not.